I figured I’d continue my “5 Scholars” gimmick series with some thoughts on scholars who I wish would write more for a non-academic audience. This is a follow-up to my “Must Read” and “Good Read” lists. Some of these guys have already written some things for a non-academic audience, but would benefit many by writing even more. In my opinion, it takes a certain skill to write for laypeople, a skill not all Bible scholars (or scholars of any stripe) are blessed with. These five, however, have what it takes to make it work, and I hope they do so in the future. Anyway, without further ado, here we go.
(1) Craig Blomberg. Blomberg is a favorite of mine. He’s a solid Bible scholar; writes nothing flashy or earth-shattering, but consistently churns out quality books. I’ve previously reviewed his Jesus & the Gospels and Neither Poverty Nor Riches here at BBG. Both of these books can be read by lay people (especially the one on the Gospels), yet are bulky and detailed enough that I’m not sure many would be drawn to them. The same goes for his The Historical Reliability of the Gospels. Perhaps I’m wrong, but I feel like his books could be read by laypeople, but don’t target them.
Books I’d like to see
- Blomberg is excellent on parables, perhaps a scaled down version (i.e., not 300+ pages) of what he’s previously written
- A lay introduction to Jesus, focusing less on scholarship and more on the Gospel accounts (maybe condense sections 3-5 of his Jesus & the Gospels)
- Of all the scholars I read, Blomberg could pull off a Jesus/Gospels Q & A better than anyone. I could see him sitting down in a room with 20 laypeople, answering questions in a way that would be informing and transforming. I’d love to see him do something like this, addressing questions of interpretation, historicity, etc. This may be something better done on his blog, but either way, I think it’d be great.
(2) Douglas Moo. For my money, Moo is one of the finest NT scholars out there. I place his Romans commentary as my personal favorite, his James commentary is up there with the best, and I’d bet his Colossians/Philemon commentary is just as good. Granted, he has written lay level commentaries on Romans and James, but I’m learning that commentaries are not as popular amongst laypeople as perhaps they once were.
Books I’d like to see
- An Intro to Paul, something along the lines of what Michael Bird accomplished and Anthony Thiselton tried to
- Some of D A Carson’s best stuff are his expositions on sections of Scripture (Sermon on the Mount, for example). I could see Moo doing something like this on a section like Romans 5-8, or maybe the intersection of faith & works.
- I’ve heard Moo is writing a book on creation and the environment. Again, if anyone could write a book like this detailing what the Bible teaches about God’s creation to a lay audience, I think Moo could do it.
- A book on Bible translation. As the chairman of the committee responsible for the upcoming NIV2011, Moo could do everyone in the church a service by writing about how translations are done, what sorts of issues are involved, why it’s more complicated than it looks, etc.
(3) Bruce Waltke. Waltke is a gifted communicator with a passion for the church. He openly admits that he writes for the church more so than the academy. The only problem is that his books tend to be huge and detailed, something that makes them far less accessible to laypeople (you know, the ones who actually comprise most of the church) than to scholars &/or trained pastors. His OT Theology weighs in at 1000+ pages (and took me forever to review), and his Proverbs commentary might be the best around, but is 2 Volumes totalling 1300+ pages.
Books I’d like to see
- A condensed version of his OT Theology
- A book on biblical wisdom, not so much an intro to wisdom literature, but a look at what it means to live wisely in a biblical sense in the 21st century
- A similar book on the Psalms, what can the Psalms teach us about how we live, worship, etc.
(4) Gordon Wenham. I feel like Wenham is often overlooked when discussing the best OT scholars out there, but if I were to list some of the best Pentateuch commentaries, he’d be near the top for Genesis, Leviticus and Numbers (the latter being one that could reach a lay audience). He has written Exploring the Old Testament: A Guide to the Pentateuch, which could hit a lay audience if it weren’t so textbookish.
Books I’d like to see
- His Leviticus commentary is quite good, I wonder if he could write a book on the theme of sacrifice in the Bible, culminating in Jesus (and I’d love to hear his thoughts on Hebrews)
- I’d love for someone to write a book taking a few major themes of the Pentateuch (3-5) and showing how they set the stage for what comes in the rest of the Bible. I’m thinking of themes like: creation, blessing, sacrifice (see above), covenant. Wenham would be a great scholar to write such a book, and could probably do it in a non-scholarly fashion.
(5) Peter O’Brien. O’Brien has written some of the best Pauline commentaries out there. His commentaries on Philippians, Colossians and Ephesians are either the best for those individual books are darn close. It is clear he has a desire to explain the text for pastors and teachers in a way that is biblically faithful and responsible. Yet, he’s written almost nothing for the lay person to read.
Books I’d like to see written
- Philippians and Ephesians both have a lot to say about the church, since O’Brien has written excellent commentaries on both, I bet he could do something along these lines
- Moore Theological College has posted 100+ O’Brien sermons/lectures online. Could any of these be turned into smaller books of expositions? I’ve listened to his series on Romans 8 and I think so.
- Like Douglas Moo above, I think he could write an excellent lay level Intro to Paul.
Is there anyone I’m missing? Any other book ideas (which, by the way, is another post I’d like to write)?











I think another book I’d like to see would be for Moo to write on justification (even though I’m still not sure that I agree with him on all points – I think he gets a lot right, though and would probably be the best proponent from the more or less traditional Protestant camp), especially doing a comparison between Paul and James and also perhaps focusing on what he sees as Protestant distinctives. I think that this could be a very useful book that could help lay people (and the rest of us) navigate the renewed Protestant/Catholic discussions. Perhaps he could team up with a historical theologian like Timothy George for that book.
I agree, that would be a good book. Moo would be a good choice, in my opinion, because I think he’s fair to those he disagrees with.
I think I had mentioned to you a while back that he did a talk on justification at Denver Seminary, did you get a chance to listen to it? If not, I may be able to send it to you.
I did get a chance to listen to it. It was a good talk. I need to listen to it again when I’m not working so that I can devote my full attention to it. I hope he revises his Romans commentary after he finishes his work on Galatians (did he hint at that or just make a joke – I couldn’t tell).
Hopefully sometime soon I’m going to shift to justification in my ‘judgment and justification’ series, in which I’ll interact with that talk, as well as with Bird/Vanhoozer (they have strong similarities), Wright, and Gorman.
I would love to see a book about creation, blessing, sacrifice , and covenant. Especially if it was written in a non-scholarly fashion for all us lay people out there. I loved your post and actually went and looked up some of these people to find out more.
Waltke actually wrote a popular-level little book on finding God’s will, in which he criticizes some of the more popular ways people speak about knowing God’s will. He proposes that the primary task of doing God’s will is simply to follow the moral commands of the scriptures and then to see how those apply to things scripture doesn’t directly speak on. This isn’t to deny God speaking to us in other ways, but it’s not primarily how doing God’s will and knowing God’s will are spoken of in scripture, and thus it’s not what our primary focus should be. It’s been out-of-print for a long time, unfortunately.
Isn’t O’Brien’s work with Kostenberger on mission in the New Testament pretty accessible?
Blomberg also wrote Contagious Holiness: Jesus’ Meals With Sinners. His NIV Application Commentary on I Corinthians was one of the first in the series and is thus much briefer and much more accessible than most. He did some great work defending a moderate complementarian position in Two Views on Women in Ministry, at a fairly popular level. I don’t agree with a couple things that are distinctive to his position, but I think he’s one of the clearest and most incisive of popular-level work on that issue. I think his NAC on Matthew is also so brief (again, because it was one of the earliest in the series) that it’s basically a popular-level commentary. It’s not much more depth than you get from the Tyndale volumes on Samuel or Kings.
So how did I not discover that Blomberg had a blog? On the subject of blogs, I think Bill Mounce is excellent at communicating to a popular audience via the blogging medium. He hasn’t (that I know of) written much for the popular level in terms of actual books, but he’s an excellent communicator in the blogging medium (with a higher biblical studies content ratio and without the vitriol that you find on a much more popular blog by a biblical scholar who is very good at communicating in the blogging medium).
[...] 5 Bible Scholars Who Should Write More for the Non-Academic [...]